Is Spain truly corrupt? We can’t be blamed for thinking so…

2 May 2013 Comments 6

There’s an internationally syndicated TV programme, made in the United States called “Judge Judy.” For those who aren’t aware, it covers real-life cases, presided over by the fully qualified lady in question. Judge Judy uses basic common sense to hand down sensible, reasoned decisions for the benefit of the TV cameras and the poor dribbling morons that watch it (my apologies and commiserations if you are one of those).

Well, ladies and gentlemen, let me introduce you to someone who makes Judge Judy look like the real deal. Another real-life lady who has courted her own publicity by effectively overseeing the biggest cover up in sports history.

Welcome to the word of Judge Julia.

This week in Madrid, Dr. Eufemiano Fuentes was found guilty of endangering public health by giving blood transfusions to elite cyclists. The evidence included additional samples, with more than 200 bags of unidentified blood and plasma seized from the doctor’s clinic. These bags potentially hold the identity of athletes from across many sports who have used doping to improve their performance but whose guilty secret currently remains hidden in the DNA. They are gold dust to the anti-doping authorities in their fight against illegal – and dangerous – practices.

BUT JUDGE JULIA PATRICIA SANTAMARIA ORDERED THEM TO BE DESTROYED

One of the biggest ever hauls of evidence – if not THE biggest – and Judge Julia wants to chuck it down the drain.

During the trial, Dr. Fuentes openly admitted that his list of clients included footballers, tennis players, athletes and boxers, but so far it’s only cyclists who’ve been directly implicated. He offered to put names to the coded bags that were in evidence during the trial, but Judge Julia told him not to bother! No wonder organisations such as the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and Spain’s Anti-Doping Agency (SADA) want to get their hands on them. After years of leg work and pushing shit uphill, a judge in an internationally relevant trial has prevented them from receiving crucial information that could help make monumental advances in their work against the drug cheats.

During the trial, WADA made a request to analyse the bags, but Judge Julia denied them – and then came up with her outrageous destruction order. At the time of writing, WADA are considering their options while SADA have launched an appeal. Supposedly, the bags are being held safely in Barcelona until their fate is ultimately secured.

How on earth can WADA, which is funded by international federations and world governments, be expected to work efficiently and prudently when there are people such as Judge Julia around? It’s not just about identifying the dopers, it’s also a chance to see what else people may have been taking. A genuine opportunity to improve the knowledge bank via the blood bank.

Spain’s reputation for being soft on sports doping has been reaffirmed and a legal process which dictates that all jail sentences under two years for first time offenders should be suspended, is hardly a message of unity. At least Dr. Fuentes was struck off – but only for four years. It doesn’t exactly reflect a huge deterrent to others does it?

Which is why the availability of those blood bags for the authorities to analyse was massively important. Judge Julia had a chance to show Spain in a positive light in the fight against doping, but instead she’s crucified their reputation with her final order.

Sports stars have had their say. Paula Radcliffe said it made her ‘mad’ and she felt like turning up on the doorstep. Andy Murray said the whole thing was a joke. It is.

It’s to be hoped that Judge Julia’s ruling is overturned on appeal and that the valuable evidence is finally handed over. It shouldn’t have been an issue and in this doping scandal, there is ultimately only one dope.

And she was the judge for f#$k’s sake…..

6 comments on "Is Spain truly corrupt? We can’t be blamed for thinking so…"

  1. Mark Quittner MrPhysio+ Healesville on 2 May 2013

    Such cases are maddening. The more I know about the way the Law operates, the less faith I have in it – Local, State, Federal & International. Logic is often supplanted be vested interests. Hopefully world outrage will be a bright enough spotlight to eradicate dark shadows with the Judges decision being overturned. Evidence often disappears: remember Henry Bolte’s blood sample for a driving offence? A cartoon of the time had a Dingo stealing it!
    Until things have had time to settle Jaimie, I suggest your future travels avoid Spain for a while….

    • Jaimie Fuller SKINS Chairman on 2 May 2013

      Such a shame Mark, it could be a huge opportunity missed. As for avoiding Spain, I’d hate that. As usual, I reckon it’s a corrupt minority doing this and the majority of Spaniards would be onside. Awful to consider how this will impact on the perception of the country.
      Thanks for the comment
      Cheers
      Jaimie

  2. Scaramouche on 2 May 2013

    The problem is that the ordinary justice hasn´t laws for punish these offences. If instead 200 blood bags they founded 1gr of cocaine, the sentence could be pretty much the same…
    The solution is only to create a law punishing the concrete doping practices.

  3. Angel on 3 May 2013

    Murray comments blaming others was a disgrace, Nadal get blood test almost every week and he asked for harder controls. Anyway they where and are more sports involve. But everyone of us knows the truth in cycling almost 100% of the professionals are dopers and the show continue. The Contador case was a joke, food intoxication yes yes… and my grandma is superman!!Professional sport is a huge business and that is the only reason they did not let Eufemiano talked.

  4. martin on 3 May 2013

    Thus us the most I’ll informed piece i have ever read on puerto. Not only that but it is driven by a basic racism that is disgusting. You are not fit to run a business let alone hold yourself as having any knowledge about this case or Cycling.

  5. Nick C on 10 May 2013

    To Martin, above: your inarticulate message undermines any possible notion that your viewpoint is worthy of consideration.

    To Jamie: good work.